The Iraq-Iran Rivalry: War, Survival, and the Shaping of the Modern Middle East
Introduction
Few rivalries in the Middle East have been as fierce, destructive, and transformative as that between Iraq and Iran. For centuries, these neighbors have been bound by geography and history yet divided by ethnic, religious, and political differences. At the heart of their conflict lies a deadly war fought in the 1980s, one that reshaped the Middle East, forged national identities, and left lasting scars. Today, although the guns have fallen silent, the echoes of that war and the struggle for influence still reverberate through the region, influencing alliances, rivalries, and the balance of power. This is the story of a conflict born out of both ancient grievances and modern politics, a complex rivalry that continues to shape the Middle East’s geopolitics.
Historical Context: Ancient Empires and Cultural Divides
The roots of Iraq-Iran tensions go back millennia, to the days of the ancient empires of Mesopotamia and Persia. Iraq’s territory was once the heart of Mesopotamian civilization, while Iran’s Persian Empire was a formidable power to the east. Over centuries, these two cultures evolved along distinct lines: Iraq became predominantly Arab and Sunni Muslim, while Iran became largely Persian and Shia Muslim, a division that remains central to the region’s sectarian politics.
The religious divide deepened after the 16th century when the Safavid Empire in Persia officially adopted Shia Islam as the state religion, intensifying tensions with the Sunni-dominated Ottoman Empire, which ruled Iraq at the time. This historical sectarian split between Shia and Sunni Islam would resurface as a major point of contention in the Iraq-Iran relationship, defining their interactions and alliances in the modern era.
The Rise of the Baath Party and the Start of Modern Tensions (1960s-1970s)
In the mid-20th century, both Iraq and Iran were transforming under strong central governments, but they followed different paths. Iraq, under the Baath Party’s secular Arab nationalism, aimed to position itself as the leading Arab power in the Middle East. In 1979, Saddam Hussein, a rising Baathist leader, assumed full control, pushing Iraq toward a more authoritarian regime and an assertive foreign policy.
Iran, meanwhile, was ruled by the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who pursued a modernizing, pro-Western agenda with strong support from the United States. Although both Iraq and Iran were non-monarchies with ambitions of regional leadership, their relationship was fraught with rivalry and suspicion, particularly as they vied for influence over the resource-rich Persian Gulf.
The 1975 Algiers Agreement was an attempt to bring stability, resolving a border dispute over the Shatt al-Arab waterway, an essential channel for oil exports. However, with the Shah’s overthrow in 1979 and the establishment of the Islamic Republic under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, relations took a severe turn. Saddam, wary of Iran’s revolutionary Shia ideology and its appeal to Iraq’s own Shia majority, soon saw an opportunity to strike.
The Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988): One of the 20th Century’s Longest Conflicts
In September 1980, Saddam Hussein launched a surprise invasion of Iran, sparking one of the most devastating wars of the 20th century. He calculated that Iran’s revolutionary turmoil and the purge of its military leadership would make it vulnerable to a quick victory, allowing Iraq to seize territory along the Shatt al-Arab and curb Iran’s influence over Iraq’s Shia population. However, Saddam’s plan quickly unraveled as Iran mobilized a vast force of volunteers and regular troops, determined to defend their revolution and repel Iraqi forces.
The Iran-Iraq War turned into a brutal stalemate, marked by trench warfare, chemical weapons, and human-wave attacks that recalled the horrors of World War I. Cities were destroyed, infrastructure was obliterated, and casualties mounted on both sides, with an estimated 500,000 to 1 million people killed. Both nations’ economies were devastated, as oil exports plummeted and resources were funneled into a prolonged and costly war effort.
The international community’s role was complex. Western powers, particularly the United States, viewed Iran as the greater threat, given its anti-Western rhetoric and revolutionary agenda. The U.S. and several Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, quietly supported Iraq, providing intelligence and economic aid, while other countries, including the Soviet Union, supplied both sides with arms. Iran, meanwhile, had limited allies, with Syria as one of its few regional supporters. After eight grueling years, the war ended in 1988 with a UN-brokered ceasefire, but no clear victor emerged. The conflict left both countries weakened and resentful, and the wounds have yet to fully heal.
Post-War Tensions and the Gulf War (1991)
The end of the Iran-Iraq War did little to ease tensions in the region. Just two years after the ceasefire, Saddam Hussein launched an invasion of Kuwait, leading to the Gulf War. The international coalition, led by the U.S., defeated Iraq’s forces, pushing them out of Kuwait and imposing severe sanctions on Iraq. Iran, officially neutral, watched closely as Saddam’s power was curtailed by Western intervention, a shift that would soon alter the balance of power between Iraq and Iran.
The 1990s were a decade of hardship for Iraq. The country’s economy crumbled under sanctions, and Saddam’s regime became increasingly isolated. Meanwhile, Iran, though still recovering from the war, maintained relative stability and strengthened its regional networks, including support for Hezbollah in Lebanon and various Shia groups in Iraq. The collapse of Saddam’s power in the Gulf War signaled a potential opening for Iran to expand its influence, setting the stage for the next major shift in their rivalry.
The 2003 U.S. Invasion of Iraq and Iran’s Influence Vacuum
In 2003, the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq removed Saddam Hussein from power, creating a power vacuum that would transform the Iraq-Iran relationship. For Iran, the fall of Saddam was both a relief and an opportunity. With a Shia-majority population, Iraq now offered fertile ground for Iran’s influence. Shia political parties and militia groups with historical ties to Iran, such as the Badr Organization and Muqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army, gained significant power and became central players in Iraq’s new political landscape.
Iran moved quickly to cement its influence, providing financial support, training, and arms to various Shia militias and political factions. Tehran aimed to ensure that Iraq would never again become a threat, while also establishing a “Shia corridor” of influence stretching from Iran to Lebanon through Iraq and Syria. The U.S., now engaged in a prolonged occupation of Iraq, viewed Iran’s growing influence with alarm, seeing it as part of a broader challenge to American interests in the region.
The Rise of ISIS and Cooperation Against a Common Enemy
The rise of ISIS in 2014, which overran large parts of Iraq and Syria, presented a unique moment of alignment between Iraq, Iran, and even the U.S., all of whom viewed ISIS as a severe threat. Iranian-backed Shia militias, such as the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), became instrumental in fighting ISIS alongside Iraqi forces, with indirect coordination from the U.S.-led coalition. This temporary alignment underscored the complex web of interests in Iraq, where rivals occasionally shared common goals but pursued them for different reasons.
For Iran, the fight against ISIS was both a strategic imperative and a justification for maintaining its presence in Iraq, portraying itself as a defender of Shia communities against Sunni extremism. For Iraq, it was a fight for survival. While the defeat of ISIS restored some stability, the underlying tensions between Iraq and Iran remained, with Baghdad walking a delicate line between Tehran’s influence and its need for support from the West.
Today’s Reality: Proxy Warfare, Sectarian Influence, and Economic Ties
The Iraq-Iran relationship is complex and multi-dimensional, encompassing cooperation, rivalry, and mutual suspicion. Iran’s influence in Iraq remains significant, with strong ties to Shia political parties, religious leaders, and militia groups. However, this influence is not universally welcomed by Iraqis, as seen in the anti-Iran protests that erupted in Baghdad and southern Iraq in 2019, where young Iraqis demanded an end to foreign interference in their country.
Economically, Iran and Iraq share extensive trade relations, with Iran supplying everything from electricity to consumer goods. This economic interdependence is crucial for both sides but has also made Iraq vulnerable to U.S. sanctions on Iran, putting Baghdad in a challenging position. Iraq’s leaders, keen to assert sovereignty, have tried to balance their relationship with both Iran and the U.S., navigating a path between two powerful and conflicting allies.
Regional Implications: Iran’s Regional Strategy and Iraq’s Struggle for Sovereignty
The Iraq-Iran rivalry is no longer a direct military conflict but a geopolitical competition with broader regional implications. Iran sees Iraq as a critical piece of its “Axis of Resistance,” an alliance that includes Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and other Shia groups in the region. By maintaining influence in Iraq, Iran seeks to counterbalance Saudi Arabia and the U.S., projecting power throughout the Middle East.
For Iraq, balancing Iran’s influence has been challenging, especially as it seeks to rebuild after years of conflict and assert its sovereignty. Iraq’s struggle for autonomy reflects the larger challenges facing the Middle East, where regional powers use proxy forces and alliances to pursue their goals. As Iraq attempts to establish itself as a stable and independent state, it must navigate a complex web of loyalties, dependencies, and aspirations, with
the shadow of Iran ever present.
Conclusion: An Uncertain Future in a Region of Complex Alliances
The Iraq-Iran relationship remains a central issue in the Middle East, where lines between cooperation, rivalry, and influence are constantly redrawn. For Iran, Iraq is a crucial ally, a buffer against foreign powers, and a key part of its regional ambitions. For Iraq, however, the relationship is a double-edged sword: while Iran’s support has been critical in times of crisis, many Iraqis see it as an intrusion, one that undermines their sovereignty and fuels sectarian divides.
As Iraq attempts to stabilize and rebuild, the path forward is fraught with challenges. Iraq’s leaders face the delicate task of balancing relations between Iran and the West, particularly the United States, which remains a significant influence on Iraq’s security and economy. Caught between these two powers, Iraq must find ways to assert its own identity and sovereignty—a goal made more difficult by internal political divisions, ongoing security threats, and a struggling economy.
For the wider region, the Iraq-Iran dynamic is more than just a bilateral relationship; it is a reflection of the broader contest for power in the Middle East, involving not only Iran but also Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and other regional actors. Iraq’s stability, sovereignty, and alliances will play a pivotal role in shaping the Middle East’s future, with repercussions that extend beyond its borders.
In a landscape where alliances shift and rivalries endure, the Iraq-Iran relationship is emblematic of the challenges facing the Middle East. It is a story of ancient divisions, modern struggles, and a shared yet contentious future. For now, Iraq stands at a crossroads, working to emerge from the shadow of its powerful neighbor while forging its own path in an ever-complex region. Whether Iraq can truly achieve a balance between independence and alliance will determine its future—and perhaps the stability of the Middle East itself.
Apocalypse Now Threedux: World War Thr33 
Leave a comment