The United States and Iraq: War, Occupation, and the Long Road to Stability
Introduction
The relationship between the United States and Iraq is a defining chapter in modern geopolitics, marked by war, occupation, and attempts at nation-building. What began with U.S. support for Iraq in the 1980s shifted dramatically after the Gulf War and, later, the 2003 invasion that ousted Saddam Hussein. The U.S. invasion, justified at the time by claims of weapons of mass destruction and the desire to bring democracy to the Middle East, transformed Iraq but also left a legacy of instability, sectarian violence, and geopolitical tension. Today, the complex relationship between Iraq and the United States continues to shape Iraq’s struggle for stability, sovereignty, and security, while influencing broader dynamics across the Middle East.
Historical Background: Early Relations and the Gulf War
U.S.-Iraq relations began with cautious support for Iraq in the 1980s, as Washington viewed Saddam Hussein’s Iraq as a counterbalance to Iran following the 1979 Islamic Revolution. During the brutal Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988), the United States provided Iraq with intelligence and logistical support to weaken Iran, despite being aware of Saddam’s use of chemical weapons. However, this tacit support waned when Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, sparking a global crisis.
The Gulf War in 1991 marked a turning point. In response to Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait, the United States led a coalition to expel Iraqi forces in a decisive but short-lived war. Following Iraq’s defeat, the U.N. imposed strict sanctions on Iraq, aimed at preventing Saddam from rebuilding his military. These sanctions contributed to widespread poverty and suffering, weakening Iraq’s economy but leaving Saddam’s authoritarian regime intact. Tensions simmered throughout the 1990s, with Iraq repeatedly violating U.N. resolutions and the United States conducting airstrikes as part of its “no-fly zones” policy over northern and southern Iraq.
The 2003 Invasion: Toppling Saddam Hussein
In the wake of the September 11, 2001, attacks, the U.S. launched the War on Terror, initially targeting al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan. However, the Bush administration quickly turned its focus to Iraq, citing concerns over weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and alleged ties between Saddam and terrorist groups. Despite widespread international opposition, the United States, along with the United Kingdom and a coalition of allies, launched an invasion of Iraq in March 2003.
The invasion swiftly toppled Saddam’s regime, with Baghdad falling within weeks. However, the U.S. failed to find WMDs, undermining the primary rationale for the war and sparking significant controversy. The occupation that followed proved far more complex and costly than anticipated, as Iraq’s political and security landscape quickly unraveled. The dismantling of Iraq’s military and the de-Baathification policy, which removed former Baath Party members from positions of influence, left a power vacuum that fueled sectarian violence and insurgency.
The Occupation and Rise of Sectarian Conflict
Following Saddam’s fall, Iraq descended into a period of instability marked by sectarian violence, insurgency, and power struggles. The U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) faced immediate challenges in governing Iraq, as insurgent groups, including Sunni militants and al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), capitalized on the power vacuum. The CPA’s decision to disband the Iraqi military and exclude former Baathists from government positions alienated many Iraqis, especially within the Sunni community, which had held significant power under Saddam’s rule.
This exclusion contributed to a growing sectarian divide, pitting Sunni and Shiite communities against each other and weakening the U.S. mission to establish a stable, unified government. Iraq’s Shiite majority, long marginalized under Saddam, gained newfound influence in the post-2003 political system. This shift intensified sectarian rivalries, leading to years of brutal violence, bombings, and assassinations that further fractured Iraqi society. By 2006, the country was engulfed in near-civil war, with neighborhoods divided along sectarian lines and daily violence claiming thousands of lives.
The U.S. Surge and Attempted Stabilization
In 2007, as violence peaked, President George W. Bush ordered a “surge” of additional U.S. troops to Iraq. Led by General David Petraeus, the surge aimed to stabilize the country, particularly in Baghdad and Anbar Province, and to reduce sectarian violence. A central component of the surge was the Sunni Awakening, a movement in which Sunni tribal leaders turned against al-Qaeda in Iraq, partnering with U.S. forces to restore local security.
The surge achieved a temporary reduction in violence and provided a window for political reconciliation, yet underlying tensions remained unresolved. While the Sunni Awakening was a key tactical victory, the Iraqi government, led by Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, was often unwilling to integrate Sunni leaders into meaningful positions of power. By 2011, when the U.S. military withdrew under the terms of the U.S.-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), Iraq’s future remained fragile, with simmering sectarian tensions and a political system vulnerable to corruption and outside influence.
The Rise of ISIS and U.S. Return to Iraq
The withdrawal of U.S. forces left Iraq’s security forces in charge of a country still deeply divided and susceptible to extremism. This instability set the stage for the emergence of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), an offshoot of al-Qaeda in Iraq. In 2014, ISIS captured large swaths of territory in northern and western Iraq, including the major city of Mosul, declaring a caliphate and attracting fighters from around the world.
In response, the U.S. launched Operation Inherent Resolve, a campaign of airstrikes and military support to help Iraqi and Kurdish forces combat ISIS. The multinational coalition, with Iraqi and Kurdish forces leading ground operations, successfully reclaimed territory from ISIS over several years. By 2017, ISIS’s territorial control had collapsed, but the group’s ideology and remnants remained active, continuing to destabilize Iraq and the broader region. The fight against ISIS reinforced Iraq’s dependence on U.S. military support, even as Iraqi leaders sought to assert their sovereignty.
Iran’s Influence and Iraq’s Struggle for Sovereignty
As the U.S. reduced its military presence, Iran expanded its influence within Iraq. Iran supported Shiite militias through the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), many of which played a major role in the fight against ISIS but also developed significant political power. Iran’s influence in Iraq has fueled concerns in both Iraq and the United States, as Tehran’s ties to powerful militias challenge the Iraqi government’s authority.
Iranian-backed militias operate with substantial autonomy, often shaping Iraq’s domestic and foreign policy to align with Tehran’s interests. This influence became particularly evident in 2020, when tensions between the U.S. and Iran escalated after a U.S. airstrike killed Qassem Soleimani, a high-ranking Iranian general, and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a senior leader in the PMF, in Baghdad. The incident intensified anti-U.S. sentiment in Iraq, with the Iraqi parliament passing a non-binding resolution calling for the withdrawal of foreign troops.
The Current U.S.-Iraq Relationship: Security, Politics, and Economic Challenges
Today, the U.S.-Iraq relationship remains one of cautious cooperation. The United States provides military assistance and training to Iraqi forces while supporting Iraq’s economic development and counterterrorism efforts. However, U.S. influence in Iraq is counterbalanced by Iran’s deep-rooted presence, and the Iraqi government must navigate its relationships with both powers. While U.S. and Iraqi forces continue to cooperate against ISIS remnants, Iraq’s political landscape is marked by factionalism, frequent protests, and demands for reform.
Economic challenges further strain Iraq’s stability. The country’s economy remains heavily dependent on oil exports, leaving it vulnerable to fluctuations in global oil prices. High unemployment, infrastructure challenges, and widespread corruption have fueled public discontent, with mass protests erupting in 2019 demanding jobs, basic services, and an end to foreign influence. The government’s slow response to these demands reflects a political system plagued by inefficiency and divided along sectarian and ethnic lines.
Future Prospects: Stability and Self-Sufficiency
The future of the U.S.-Iraq relationship will be shaped by Iraq’s ability to achieve self-sufficiency, reduce reliance on foreign military aid, and strengthen governance. While the U.S. presence remains critical to Iraq’s fight against extremism, many Iraqis seek greater sovereignty and less dependence on foreign powers. Balancing relations with the U.S. and Iran remains a central challenge for Iraq’s leaders, as the country sits at the intersection of competing regional interests.
Iraq’s path forward requires substantial reform, including combating corruption, building institutions, and creating opportunities for Iraq’s youth. Addressing economic diversification and improving governance could reduce Iraq’s vulnerability to external influence and enhance its stability. For the United States, maintaining a relationship based on mutual respect for Iraq’s sovereignty and supporting its democratic institutions will be essential in building a sustainable partnership.
Conclusion: A Complex Legacy and a Cautious Partnership
The U.S.-Iraq relationship has evolved from one of military intervention to an intricate partnership marked by shared goals but complex challenges. The legacy of war, sectarian violence, and foreign influence continues to weigh heavily on Iraq, shaping its political and security environment. As Iraq works toward self-reliance, the United States faces the task of supporting this goal without undermining Iraqi sovereignty.
For Iraq, stability will come not through foreign intervention but through a commitment to addressing the underlying issues that have left the country vulnerable to conflict and external influence. Iraq’s future stability depends on tackling systemic corruption, fostering inclusive governance, and addressing the grievances of its diverse population. The Iraqi people’s demands for economic opportunity, basic services, and political accountability highlight the need for reforms that prioritize national unity and resilience over factional interests.
For the United States, the path forward will require a careful balance—supporting Iraq’s fight against extremism and its economic recovery without infringing on Iraqi sovereignty. This partnership, if managed respectfully, has the potential to aid Iraq in becoming a stable, self-reliant nation capable of withstanding regional pressures and contributing to the broader stability of the Middle East.
As Iraq faces the long road toward recovery, the U.S.-Iraq relationship stands as both a reminder of the complexities of foreign intervention and a testament to the possibilities of cautious cooperation. The journey ahead is uncertain, but with sustained commitment to sovereignty, reform, and mutual respect, Iraq can chart a future shaped by the aspirations of its people rather than the legacies of its past.
Apocalypse Now Threedux: World War Thr33 
Leave a comment